Stupid Wikipedia
 |
It wasn't until they were criticized by my boss at work one day and I researched them and their content a bit more that I ceased contributions because of their distinct lack of technical merit and accuracy as well as frank bias to a sufficient degree.
Since January 15, 2001 they have been calling themselves "a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians."
What they don't tell you is the mentally deficient libtard editorial staff slants most everything such that objectivity does not exist and the stupidity of those messing up the articles is rampant without intervening editorial control — or even an attempt to get dates consistently correct.
It's written in PHP so that alone is enough for me to abandon them as the irrelevalent steaming hot libtard mess that they are.
What they are in effect is just another nazi libtard abomination in the vein of Youtube, Facebook, and Amazon and as such should be stricken from the record as a zero value "would be asset" if they had any worth in the world at all.
They have problems with facts, dates, and just about every aspect of what an "encyclopedia" is supposed to provide rendering their reference value totally nil to me personally.
Seeing how I no longer utilize them for anything anymore I figured it a reasonable idea to stop contributing to their whiny campaigns which predominate their interface.
Thanks Mark for helping me see the light on their totally unsuitable inaccurate and extremely biased presence.
Boo.