New York crooks Lawfare Judge and Manhattan DA
 |
Bragg's unconstitutional and unprecedented Russian nesting doll theory of criminal liability, in which the jury never had to reach unanimity as to each element of the alleged criminal offenses. There must be accountability. There must be consequences.
Bragg usurped the federal government's exclusive authority to prosecute alleged violations of federal campaign finance laws and the Biden Harris Administration's refused to intercede to protect federal interests. These people were in cahoots to contrive charges and they are in addition to the democratic party and main stream media liars of comission and omission. Boo.
Judge Merchan's conspicuously bad and offensive legal rulings before and during the trial that all curtailed President Trump's rights, including:
His failure to recuse himself for blatant political bias against President Trump.
The unconstitutional gag order he imposed on President Trump during the trial.
Judge Merchan's admission of plainly inadmissible, irrelevant, and unfairly prejudicial testimony against President Trump.
His refusal to permit former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith to testify as to the meaning and complexities of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
This custom lawfare should result in prision for life on bread and water or execution of the perpetrators. Put them against a wall, shoot them, and allow them to rot where their worthless criminal asses drop.
Those who practice law in New York, including elected district attorneys and appointed judges, must take a "constitutional oath of office," swearing or affirming to "support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York."
The oath required District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan ostensibly meant they were "bound to a constitutional course of conduct." In their politicized efforts to indict and convict President Trump, they failed these oaths of office. The State of New York did not hold them to any of the standards of ethics and comportment set forth in the judiciary.
Given that President Trump's indictment was conceived in legal and constitutional error with a trial complicated simply made everything worse. An honest review of the facts and the law will likely lead appellate courts to vacate the conviction and dismiss the indictment with prejudice.
This restore some of the American people's trust and confidence in our justice system but MUCH remains to be done. In the meantime, the Committee and Select Subcommittee will continue our oversight of lawfare and its effect on the rule of law in the United States.
However, there needs to be accountability during the crimes not as an after thought.
 |