Digisexuality is not the way
 |
They indicate the preference is derived from a tolerance by the sex dolls to permit any manner of interaction with them and thusly the expense is justified when the fray is no longer a battle, but more so a conquering of a fake companion in the name of personal gratification.
My first issue with all of this lay in the vicinity of realism and that fact that the plasticized substutes for human intimacy don't really look like realistic people ...
More like those mannequins which may be encountered is some sales window only with exaggerated lady parts.
I decline to consider "fetching" some model which really projects a barbi doll on steriods with their injection molded genitalia, servo controlled underlying joints ...
and oh yes, the accompanying notebook computer many include designed to make the lump of plastic be conversant, compliant, replete with moaning and able to whisper sweet nothings in the course of becoming your everything.
There is nothing to hug when it comes from a cardboard shipping crate as far as I am concerned.
Personally the pursuit of a real female of the species is far preferable to any such plasticized imitation or sicko tranny failure at interpersonal relations.
I like females. Genetic females. XX genotypes and only please. No substitutions. No exceptions. No gays. No roll and tuck gender delusional dysphorics. AND certainly no plastic imitations either.
Hetero is the ONLY O.